Crescent Heights Proposes One of Miami Beach’s Tallest Buildings at 1575 Alton Road
Miami Beach’s skyline could get its tallest addition in nearly three decades, after a developer submitted plans for a 43-story tower in the Flamingo/Lummus neighborhood, just east of West Avenue. The developer behind the proposal is Crescent Heights, the Miami-based firm led by Russel Galbut, which has become one of the most active players in Miami Beach’s emerging high-rise pipeline. The company has proposed nearly 10 high-rise developments across the city as it continues to pursue a significant vertical transformation of Miami Beach. The 163-unit tower would replace a Firestone tire repair center at 1575 Alton Road dating to 1935, which has since been converted into dining space. While the building is among the older structures in the surrounding neighborhood, it’s not protected by historic designation. The property sits just outside the boundaries of the area’s historic districts and is classified as non-contributing, meaning the existing structure does not contribute to the historic character of the district. How is it possible? Well, the proposal is being pursued under Florida’s Live Local Act, the state’s major pro-housing law intended to encourage new housing production. The legislation provides qualifying developments with significant zoning advantages, including the highest density permitted within the municipality and the ability to reach the highest height allowed within one mile of the property, alongside tax incentives and other benefits. In exchange, at least 40% of the project’s units must be designated as workforce housing. For this development, that translates to 62 workforce units, which will occupy the lower floors of the tower and be priced at 120% of Area Median Income; that corresponds to maximum rents range from $2,862 for studios to $3,066 for one-bedroom units, $3,678 for two-bedroom units, and $4,249 for three-bedroom units. It’s unclear if Crescent Heights will go this high, but it’s possible. The remaining residences will occupy the upper portion of the tower. A total of 91 larger units, likely intended as for-sale condominiums, are planned between levels 15 and 43. Across the building, residents will have access to a pool, private club spaces, outdoor seating and open areas, as well as approximately 4,107 square feet of indoor amenity space. The project will also include a parking deck with 149 vehicle spaces and 170 bicycle spaces. Beneath the parking structure, approximately 1,739 square feet of commercial space will front Alton Road, adding a small retail component to the development. At approximately 557 feet, the tower would come remarkably close to the height of Miami Beach’s two tallest buildings, the Blue and Green Diamond towers at 559 feet, which were completed in 2000. If built as proposed, the Crescent Heights project would become the city’s third-tallest structure and the tallest building constructed in Miami Beach in nearly three decades. Designed by RSP Architects, the tower will feature a palette of white and brown tones, floor-to-ceiling windows, and selectively placed balconies. A perforated decorative mesh screen will wrap portions of the parking garage, helping conceal the structure while adding another architectural element to the base of the tower. Unlike many major developments in Miami Beach, the project will not advance through the city’s traditional public board process because of its submission through the Live Local Act. Instead, its approval will largely depend on whether the proposal complies with applicable zoning, building, and safety requirements rather than proceeding through a series of public hearings and community reviews. That process has also kept much of the project’s evolution out of public view. Floridian Development first reported on the proposal when it called for an 18-story tower. Over the following months, the project continued to change, eventually growing into the 43-story, 557-foot tower now being submitted to the city. If approved and ultimately built as proposed, the project would not only add 163 residences to Miami Beach’s housing supply, but also introduce one of the city’s most significant new additions to its skyline in decades.
Miami Beach’s Savoy Hotel Could Face Demolition for a 38-Story Tower Under the Live Local Act
Miami Beach’s iconic Ocean Drive is quickly coming at a crossroads between preservation and growth. The iconic, postcard-worthy stretch of art deco architecture now faces the threat of redevelopment, as developers quietly file plans for towering high-rises on sites occupied by some of the city’s most recognizable historic buildings. That shift is possible thanks to the state’s Live Local Act, widely regarded as one of the most influential and permissive pro-housing bills passed in the country. The latest example to reach Ocean Drive is The Savoy, a proposal submitted this past June that would redevelop the Savoy Hotel, a property made up of two historic structures, the Savoy and the Arlington, built in 1937 and 1941 respectively. According to never-seen-before planning documents obtained by Floridian Development, New York-based Allied Partners intends to demolish most of the historic site at 425 Ocean Drive, preserving only a portion of the Savoy as a nod to its past. It’s a massive change that’s gone largely unnoticed for months, and that’s not an accident. The Live Local Act is built to move through administrative review, meaning projects skip public boards unless a hearing becomes unavoidable. The public, in other words, gets left out of the room. That setup has stirred plenty of controversy, but it’s not without its logic. The bill’s whole premise is to boost the supply of workforce and market-rate housing to bring costs down, and skipping public boards is part of the cost savings since those hearings have a habit of tying projects up for months, especially in a city like Miami Beach. The height and density perks don’t hurt either. Developers can borrow the tallest allowed height from any parcel within a mile, which means some parts of Ocean Drive is now fair game for a high-rise. They can also build to the highest density allowed anywhere in the municipality. It’s a serious set of zoning changes, and it shows. The Specifics: That freedom has produced a proposal that would rank among the tallest structures in the city if it gets built. Inside, there will be 150 units split between 90 condos and 60 workforce units. The workforce units will sit on the lower floors facing Ocean Drive, running from studios (the most common layout) up to one-bedroom and one-bedroom-plus-den units. The condos, by contrast, will be on the larger side, averaging around 2,000 square feet apiece. The workforce housing requirement is baked into the Live Local Act itself. Developers must price at least 40% of units at or below 120% of the Area Median Income, and keep them there for at least 30 years. Beyond residences, ‘The Savoy’ will also bring 76 hotel rooms. Hotel guests get a full suite of amenities on the tower’s seventh level: multiple pools, outdoor green space, seating areas, beach access, yoga space, a barbecue area, and more. Condo owners get their own rooftop pool and separate shared amenities. On the ground floor of The Savor, there will be 10,958 square feet of commercial space, purpose-built for a beach club. The project also adds 1,472 square feet of street-facing retail, a private drop-off for valet and residents, and 257 parking spaces tucked out of sight behind active uses. Without the planned demolition of the majority of the property, these lower floor uses will likely be impossible or significantly scaled back. Rising 38 floors, the tower will hit about 453 feet to the roof, or around 480 feet at its tallest point. The facade, designed by South Florida-based Arquitectonica, mixes white and gray stucco, wood paneling, floor-to-ceiling glass, and glass balconies. The main tower reads as a rectangle, wrapped in balconies across most of the facade, and built with zero setbacks, giving it a rather imposing massing. Can Demolition Actually Happen? Still, while zoning laws may permit the density, height, and scale of the site, there’s a separate question of whether the city retains any leverage over what happens to the historic structures themselves. The Savoy has long carried local historic designation as part of Miami Beach’s Ocean Beach Historic District, where both the Savoy and Arlington are considered contributing buildings. However, what actually stood between Miami Beach’s historic buildings and the wrecking ball was the city’s own Historic Preservation Board, which for decades could deny demolition permits outright or force developers to preserve and replicate a building’s original design. That power is exactly what the state significantly eliminated in 2024. The Resiliency and Safe Structures Act, signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis, strips Miami Beach’s preservation board of its authority to block demolition of buildings along the coast deemed unsafe or noncompliant with FEMA flood standards. The law does carve out exemptions, St. Augustine, Palm Beach, Key West, the famed postcard stretch of the Ocean Drive promenade, and individual landmarks like the Fontainebleau, but the Savoy, sitting further south in the South of Fifth neighborhood, falls outside that protected zone. It’s named directly among the South-of-Fifth buildings the law leaves exposed. Which means, as things currently stand, it can potentially be demolished through the same “unsafe structure” pathway that brought down the MiMo-era Deauville hotel in 2022, and without the public hearing that once would have given residents a chance to fight it. The developer isn’t hiding the mechanism. In an April 2026 letter of intent to the city, an attorney for the developer confirms the Arlington’s fate directly, writing that the building, “currently cordoned off by construction fencing and stabilized through shoring, has been closed to the public since it was badly damaged in Hurricane Irma,” and that “due to its current state, in accordance with the Resiliency and Safe Structures Act, and as allowed by the Live Local Act itself, the Arlington structure will not be preserved in the project.” Editor’s note: The legal and regulatory issues surrounding the proposed demolition of the historic structures are complex and remain subject to further verification. This article reflects the documents (developer’s application and letter of intent) and regulations available at the time of publication.